"Night of Champions" is one of WWE's yearly pay-per-view events and it is one that wrestling fans have tuned in for time and time again. With every championship on the line, it's clear that a great deal of attention is going to be placed on it. That being said, I cannot help but feel as though the show wasn't nearly as effective as it could have been. There were many reasons for this and I feel as though an Internet marketing company could have come into play in tremendous fashion.
One of the elements of the show that seemed to frustrate me more than anything else was how the interactive polls were done. WWE fans were allowed to vote on who they believed to be the greatest WWE Champion, Intercontinental Champion, amongst others. Each option would be given five candidates, which is the biggest issue that I have with this structure. I feel as though this is nothing short of a caveat, giving fans the illusion of a choice when they don't really have it at all.
To me, it seems like a more concrete networking platform would have been much more viable if WWE was serious about polling. After all, Twitter doesn't limit itself to polling choices, which makes it better already. It also gives fans the idea of casting in choices that they believe to be true, even if WWE wouldn't have thought about them earlier. This eliminates predetermined selections that we have seen before and it only helps to give them far more breathing room than they would have had otherwise.
If you ask me, it would be best if an Internet marketing company came into play, even if it was only for one night. I would like to believe that firms along the lines of fishbat have a better grasp on the element of choice than WWE does. It's not exactly fair to the audience to keep them locked into such choices, especially when they are fully aware that they don't exactly have the freedom that WWE suggests that they do. I have to wonder why the company believes that this is an effective model.
WWE may be known for its cases of revisionist history but I cannot help but feel as though their choices are a tad confusing. Why shouldn't fans have more options when it comes to these polls? In fact, why should individuals have to be locked to particular choices at all? As I alluded to earlier, I feel as though Twitter would be the absolute best platform for WWE to conduct its polls within because it just seems like there's more of an opportunity for interaction here than any other platform.
One of the elements of the show that seemed to frustrate me more than anything else was how the interactive polls were done. WWE fans were allowed to vote on who they believed to be the greatest WWE Champion, Intercontinental Champion, amongst others. Each option would be given five candidates, which is the biggest issue that I have with this structure. I feel as though this is nothing short of a caveat, giving fans the illusion of a choice when they don't really have it at all.
To me, it seems like a more concrete networking platform would have been much more viable if WWE was serious about polling. After all, Twitter doesn't limit itself to polling choices, which makes it better already. It also gives fans the idea of casting in choices that they believe to be true, even if WWE wouldn't have thought about them earlier. This eliminates predetermined selections that we have seen before and it only helps to give them far more breathing room than they would have had otherwise.
If you ask me, it would be best if an Internet marketing company came into play, even if it was only for one night. I would like to believe that firms along the lines of fishbat have a better grasp on the element of choice than WWE does. It's not exactly fair to the audience to keep them locked into such choices, especially when they are fully aware that they don't exactly have the freedom that WWE suggests that they do. I have to wonder why the company believes that this is an effective model.
WWE may be known for its cases of revisionist history but I cannot help but feel as though their choices are a tad confusing. Why shouldn't fans have more options when it comes to these polls? In fact, why should individuals have to be locked to particular choices at all? As I alluded to earlier, I feel as though Twitter would be the absolute best platform for WWE to conduct its polls within because it just seems like there's more of an opportunity for interaction here than any other platform.
About the Author:
Visit SEO Long Island company, fishbat, if you're looking for more information about Internet marketing with SEO.
No comments:
Post a Comment